Score: 10

"Well done!"

submission: Toss the Turtle

date: August 28, 2009

Very well made, fun stuff. The Only problem I have with this game is the infinite nukes - they provide no upper bound for skill-based gameplay and thus no measure for comparison when it comes to score. I stockpiled 100 of them, made five million feet without the five hour achievement, and very nearly fell asleep doing it. There's just no catharsis in that. Put a limit on the nukes and, if possible, some sort of online high-score tracker and I'd be far more addicted to this otherwise play-and-forget game.

Score: 8

"What can I say?"

submission: Baby Factory

date: January 31, 2007

That was a weird concept with a weird execution and a wildly tangential plot, which of course is pretty wicked hilarious. You could definitely use to clean up the graphics a little bit.

I'm not sure the fecal cameo does anything to drive up the humor value, but then I'm not much of a poop man. It was certainly odd enough but random is easy and you could probably find something significantly more disturbing and less... icky. If those two words are at all different to you. Sometimes they aren't. That's fine too.

Score: 7

"Self-defeating but satisfying."

submission: Grammar Ninja

date: January 31, 2007

There definitely are some issues with grammar here, but as it says I'm looking at a draft version. A time or two I just ended up blowing up words en masse so as to figure out where the not-an-adverb adverb was. Thankfully it's not a competitive game and blowing up words is in itself somewhat satisfying. I think you should definitely have someone look at your text before you next resubmit - an English teacher if you still have one, or just some happy grammar ninja with a little time to spare.

Hmm. As a grammar nazi myself I can't give these mistakes an excellent vote, but I'll be back again to shuriken. Good concept, well-executed, just... yeah. You know your weakness